QA2019-105 - EBA template
Atribute | Detail |
---|---|
Resolution Reporting Subject Matter | Guidance |
Guidance Documents | FinRep-reconciliation |
Taxonomy | - |
Unique Identifier |
QA2019-105 |
Question
With reference to line 150, there are differences in the operating SRB instructions and EBA ones. According to the instructions the definition of c0042 in T.01.00 “institutions” should be “credit institutions and investment firms” so it should also include investment firms, in which case there might be double reporting. However, in Z.02.00 column 0040 the definition is “Credit institutions”. Is this discrepancy between the templates purposeful? We believe that “institution” in T.01.00.a should mean only “credit institution” in order to be aligned with FINREP, and avoid double reporting. Could you, please, confirm this?
Response
We align with the EBA definition: credit institutions includes investment firms.
Related articles
-
-
QA2025-12- Due date for reporting of MREL TLAC Q1 2025 (Questions and Answers)
-
-
-
-
-
QA2024-23 - FMIR T33.00 c0090 Value of transactions on proprietary accounts (Questions and Answers)
-
QA2024-16 - ECB Market Data for Payments to MFIs and Non-MFIs (Questions and Answers)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
QA2023-23 - Should Transfer Agents be reported in the FMIR? (Questions and Answers)